Holding One’s Breath
- 04 November 2024 (10 min read)
Poll aggregators suggest that the US presidential race is very tight, but the change in dynamics – Harris’ national lead has been shrinking slowly since mid-October, and Trump is now seen in the lead in 5 out of 7 swing states, albeit with tiny margins – combined with the memory of the polls’ understatement of voting intentions for the Republican candidate in 2016 and 2020 has pushed the market into pricing quite clearly a Trump victory. Collectively, investors seem to agree with the notion that a Trump 2.0 administration would come with more inflation and a higher deficit – we concur. This results in a rise in US long-term yields and an upward revision in the market’s expected trajectory for the Fed even in the absence of new significant macro data.
We explore once again the main macro policy issues at stake here (regulation, immigration, trade, fiscal policy, and the possible erosion of the Fed’s independence), with the help of a remarkable, quantified paper by the Peterson Institute which tackles three out these five issues. The paper largely confirms our view that, taken in isolation, a 10% hike in US tariffs would be manageable by the rest of the world, especially if monetary policy is allowed to play its stabilisation role, adopting a more hawkish stance in the US and a more dovish one elsewhere. However, we disagree with the mostly benign assessment of the impact of a 60% tariff hike on imports from China on third countries. We do not think that in such configuration we could count on a relative stability of the yuan. The temptation of depreciating the currency aggressively would become very difficult to resist in Beijing, with significant knock-on effects on Europe. We also highlight the importance of the contagion effects from a dominant US bond market in case of additional fiscal drift. This calls for even more readiness to act, if need be, by the ECB.
While the US elections leaves of course little bandwidth, we also explore the UK budget unveiled last week. The market reaction was measured, but we feel a chance to build a mutually beneficial trade-off between fiscal and monetary policy has been missed there.
Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.
This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.
The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.
Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.