
Renouncing Privileges
- 17 March 2025 (7 min read)
Gillian Tett reported in the Financial Times on an idea circulating in Washington that financial flows into the US could be taxed to raise revenue and/or to depreciate the US dollar. A similar solution was mentioned in Stephen Miran’s influential essay which we discussed three weeks ago. This would raise the funding cost of the US government and would ultimately express a renunciation of the “exorbitant privilege” which for decades has allowed the US to pursue largely unconstrained fiscal policies thanks to the dollar status as the world’s dominant reserve currency.
There is a precedent in the modern history of the US when the White House voluntarily affected the US dollar status by surprise: the “Nixon shock” of August 1971, when the President suspended the convertibility to gold. While it was a political success for Richard Nixon in the short-term, it ended up exacerbating the US inflation problem. Equally, we do not think that renouncing the “exorbitant privilege” would serve the US economic interests in the long-run – the evidence that a dollar overvaluation has “hollowed out” US productive forces is scarce in our view – but these debates fuel a “mood music” in Washington which in any case is contributing to the ongoing correction of the USD.
There is no off-the-shelf solution to reshape the international monetary system should the dollar status erode. In 2010 the IMF worked on some ideas, but expanding the role of the Special Drawing Rights would not be straightforward. In any case, cooperative solutions would require a level of support for multilateralism which is – for now at least – missing in the US administration. The Euro area’s preference for current account surpluses has for long impaired the Euro’s capacity to play a major role in the international monetary system. The change of fiscal stance in Berlin may change this. Yet, a lot would need to be done on capital market union – including the emergence of a larger pool of jointly-issued safe assets – to bring the European currency closer to the requirements of a dominants reserve currency in terms of market depth and liquidity. Streamlining the EU’s decision-making process would also probably be necessary. Raising the euro status is however no longer unthinkable.
Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.
This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.
The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.
Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.