Fog on the Window
- 18 March 2024 (10 min read)
The market has moved markedly from its exuberant expectations of massive cuts by the Fed to price barely three cuts in 2024. The mood music is that there is now a distinct risk the US central bank will be unable to cut at all this year because of a window for easing closing well ahead of the presidential elections. We agree that some key details in the latest prints of the consumer price index are concerning but we also think there are enough signals elsewhere for Jay Powell to continue to guide towards a gradual removal of some of the current restrictive stance. The revised data for January and the February print for wages have been reassuring, with a pace consistent with a return to 2% inflation given the US strong productivity performance. We also highlight a very recent paper by the Brookings suggesting that the much higher than expected net immigration in the US could explain why the US economy could continue to create many jobs without triggering further tension on wage. On the political constraints, we think it would be reputationally very dangerous for the Fed to allow the looming elections to influence its reaction function and choose inaction if the data warranted a monetary easing, and there is no obvious historical pattern to substantiate a strong influence of the pre-electoral context on Fed decisions. We explore the consequences for the ECB of the risk the Fed would not cut in June. The only strong argument in favour of taking on board the Fed’s attitude would be the potential impact on European inflation transiting through another depreciation in the exchange rate. Yet, we think that the current euro exchange rate level already takes on board a baseline in which the ECB cuts more than the Fed this year, and in any case the ECB’s key focus now is domestic inflation, not the role of external forces. There is quite some trepidation on the possibility the Bank of Japan could end its negative rate policy this week already. The results of the wage negotiations certainly fuel the BOJ’s resolve to start normalising, but we still think moving in April presents some advantages. What really matters anyway is not whether the BOJ moves in March or April, but how it will handle the end of Yield Curve Control. |
Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.
This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.
The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.
Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.