Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

France: political uncertainty to persist

KEY POINTS
The left alliance NFP secured c. 180 seats in the National Assembly – still far from the majority threshold – the centrist Ensemble came second with c. 168 and the far-right RN third with just 143, well below poll projections.
None of the most radical macroeconomic platforms tabled during the campaign has a realistic chance to be implemented. But the new problem is how a three-way split can be pulled into a workable government.
Most concerns and a likely timetable for resolution focus on France’s budget and fiscal outlook. With France facing an Excessive Deficit Procedure, a new government must deliver a budget adhering to EU rules by early October.
The path forward is uncertain, France having no history of this type of coalition. We expect several trial-and-error attempts at a solution but think a short-term government with limited mainstream agenda is a likely outcome.

The surge in the Rassemblement National (RN) in the European elections continued into the first round of the national elections: the far-right party came out first in 297 constituencies. The second-round brought however a very sharp correction. Not only did the RN fail to achieve the outright majority that it had hoped – although we suggested looked unlikely after the first round – but it fell well short of other groups, coming in third with just 143 seats, below Macron’s Ensemble that recorded c.168 seats (down heavily from 245 in 2022) and the Nouveau Front Populaire (NFP) – the left-wing alliance – that came first with c.180 seats (there is still some margin around the numbers per party since deputies have until 18 July to declare their affiliation to a parliamentary group).


The “Republican tradition” is that the President of the Republic appoints someone from the biggest group in parliament as Prime Minister, although it is not a constitutional obligation. NFP is using this tradition to claim the job, with internal jockeying among the various components of the alliance, which ranges from the radical La France Insoumise (LFI), probably the biggest caucus with NFP once deputies declare their affiliation, to historical government parties (Socialists, Communists and Greens). Arithmetically, a “NFP-only” government, implementing the alliance’s radical economic platform, would have almost zero chance of survival, since all the other groups would have the numbers to force a NFP Prime Minister to resign by voting a motion of no confidence.

Download full article
Download report (308.4 KB)
Pre-emptive vs Reactive
Macroeconomics

Pre-emptive vs Reactive

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 02 September 2024 (10 min read)
Investment Institute
Take Two: US Q2 GDP revised up; Eurozone inflation falls sharply
Macroeconomics Weekly Market Update

Take Two: US Q2 GDP revised up; Eurozone inflation falls sharply

  • by AXA Investment Managers
  • 02 September 2024 (3 min read)
Investment Institute
Take Two: Fed signals potential rate cut in September; gold price hits record high
Macroeconomics Weekly Market Update

Take Two: Fed signals potential rate cut in September; gold price hits record high

  • by AXA IM Investment Institute
  • 26 August 2024 (3 min read)
Investment Institute

    Disclaimer

    The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.

    This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.

    AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.

    The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.

    Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.