Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Mind the Crowds!

  • 24 June 2024 (10 min read)
KEY POINTS
New polls with seat projections suggest RN is getting closer to the majority threshold in France, but a hung parliament remains the most plausible outcome.
France back under EDP is a reminder that fiscal space is non-existent. Using up domestic banks to absorb large public debt supply can be tempting but is ultimately economically toxic as it crowds out private sector funding.

The outcome of the French elections remains highly uncertain. Voting intentions are gravitating towards the three main blocks as those attached to smaller political families probably want to make their vote count, and RN retains its dominant position. More polls providing seat projections put RN closer to the majority threshold, but judging by the surveys a hung parliament remains (just) the most plausible outcome. A lot will depend on how many qualifying candidates from the historical government parties in third position in the first round will decide to withdraw from the second round to contain the far right.

The announcement by the European Commission that France, along with 7 other member states, is back under “Excessive Deficit Procedure” (EDP) – although it did not have much of an impact on spreads so far - is another occasion to realise that corrective action is needed to avoid a major drift in public debt. This is a blind spot in France’s current debate, organised around “moderately spendthrift” and “very spendthrift” proposals from the two political forces leading in the polls. Incidentally, the fact that Italy is again under EDP as well should be a reminder that the “Meloni blueprint”, often used to sketch out what could be the economic approach of a RN-led government in France, has not yet been tested for a potentially painful fiscal tightening under close EU monitoring.

French banks’ equity prices have improved slightly from their low on 14 June. Fortunately, their exposure to the sovereign is small relative to their Italian counterparts for instance. Yet, before the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, French and Italian banks had very similar levels of exposure. The experience acquired during the “bad old days” of the early 2010s suggests that going the “Italian way” and getting local banks to take up a rising share of local public debt, while understandable from a financial stability point of view, can become economically toxic as this crowds out lending to the private sector and depresses growth on trend. There is domestic space to absorb French debt, but using up this space would still entail a macroeconomic cost. 

Download the full article
Download report (485.48 KB)

Elections, protectionism and China-India divergence

In this first episode of The Sound of Finance, our host Gilles Moec shares his views on the European political agenda and speaks to Irina Topa-Serry about the position of China and its neighbour India, which is climbing the global economic ladder at a breathtaking pace.

One Week at a Time
Macroeconomics Viewpoint Chief Economist

One Week at a Time

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 01 July 2024 (10 min read)
Investment Institute
Uncertain Winds
Macroeconomics

Uncertain Winds

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 17 June 2024 (10 min read)
Investment Institute
Fast-Forwarding
Macroeconomics

Fast-Forwarding

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 10 June 2024 (10 min read)
Investment Institute

    Disclaimer

    The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.

    This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.

    AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.

    The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.

    Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.