US reaction: Core inflation sticky again, but eclipsed by jobless claims

KEY POINTS
Headline CPI eased to 2.4% and a 3½ year low, but above consensus estimates; core inflation edged higher to 3.3%
Headline inflation is being flattered by lower oil prices, an effect that will reverse next month
Shelter inflation finally eased back and moderated the overall services increase - the Fed has long been expecting this
Ex-shelter services inflation rose by 0.6% on the month – similar to the Q1 increases – buoyed by education and health care costs
The report should add a sense of caution to the outlook for Fed rate cuts; we expect 0.25% cuts in November and December
Market reaction was driven by the rise in jobless claims. For now we attribute most of this to hurricane distortions

US CPI inflation came in above consensus for September, the headline rate easing to 2.4% from 2.5% in August, but firmer than the expected 2.3% (a 0.2% monthly gain compared to a 0.1% expected). Core inflation reported its second consecutive above consensus report, rising on the month by 0.3% - the same as last month (0.31% vs 0.28% unrounded)  – compared to expectations for 0.2%. The core annual rate of inflation edged higher to 3.3%, back to its June level – although still a 3-year low before that.   

Although the CPI miss to consensus was small in overall terms, albeit the second such for ‘core’, the details of the report add a little more caution. First, today’s inflation reading came despite a very benign month for oil prices, feeding through to gasoline prices. Gasoline fell by 4% on the month (adjusted) compared with a modest rise last year. This took 0.2% off the headline rate in September. Importantly this looks likely to unwind next month with oil prices having picked up across October, versus a sharp 4.3% drop last October. Second, the more modest impact from services inflation, which rose by 0.4% on the month and took the annual rate to 4.7% and a 32-month low, was buoyed by the weakening in shelter inflation, which gained just 0.2% on the month. This is the second weakest monthly print in 3-years and adds further evidence that an eventual slowdown in housing costs is starting to materialize (after an unusually firm 0.5% rise last month). However, from the Fed’s point of view, Fed Chair Powell had made it clear that the Fed was pretty much assuming that this was in the post, whether in the data or not. Third, what a modest services versus weak shelter inflation print means is that ex-shelter inflation spiked. This measure rose by 0.6% - in line with two of the three months at the start of the year that caused the Fed to delay the commencement of its easing cycle – in turn driven by solid gains in education and medical care costs.

In broad terms, the case for US disinflation is broadly unchanged. Headline inflation is at a 3½ year low; core still close to a three year low. This suggests space for the Fed to continue to ease the restrictiveness of policy. However, we suggest that depressed energy prices are contributing to the weakness in headline inflation – and may not persist - with core inflation still elevated by shelter inflation (4.9% y/y), which should ease, but with ex-shelter services inflation also high at 4.4%, which may not. The question then is about how quickly the Fed may ease policy. The minutes to September’s FOMC meeting stated that a ”substantial majority” supported the 50bps move. But the minutes also reported that “some” would have “preferred a 25bps reduction”, while “a few .. could have supported such a decision” and “Several .. that [25bps] would be in line with a gradual path of policy normalization”. This conveys a sense of meaningful pushback from the Committee in September. Today’s figures remind that there is likely to be some need for restrictive policy over the coming quarters to ensure that inflation returns to target on a sustained basis. With financial conditions now looser than the average of the previous decade, we argue that the Fed’s implicit endorsement of the market’s aggressive expected easing is overcooked. Indeed, following the recent payrolls print markets have repriced the outlook for Fed easing. We forecast two 25bps cuts over the next two meetings. However, we suggest that market and Fed expectations that rate cuts will continue smoothly across next year will be election dependent. We see several election scenarios, including the re-election of former President Trump, where the Fed’s space to ease policy is restricted across the course of next year.           

Market reaction, however, was dominated by the sharp jump in jobless claims, which rose by 33k to 258k – the most in more than a year. Much of this we believe to reflect disruption from hurricane Helene, but the report also identified a rise in Michigan lay-offs, which is likely in part reflecting reduced shifts at Stellantis. Jobless claims could be elevated for a number of weeks reflecting ongoing hurricane disruption and this is likely to keep the market and Fed cautious. Markets halved the previous probability of the Fed not cutting in November, now seeing just a 16% chance of no move, and increased the likelihood of two 0.25% cuts this year to 80%. 2-year US Treasury yields dropped 6bps to 3.98% and 10-year fell by 2bps to 4.07% - although still the highest levels since end-July. The dollar dropped 0.2% against a basket of currencies, but also remains at its firmest since early August.      

Exhibit 1: Services ex-shelter inflation jumps in September
Source: BLS, October 2024

    Disclaimer

    The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.

    This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.

    AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.

    The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.

    Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.