Remember “Trumpnomics”?
- 11 March 2024 (10 min read)
Donald Trump’s victorious Super Tuesday, combined with so far favourable decisions by the Supreme Court, make it now highly likely that the November duel will be a re-run of 2020 at a time when, in the general polls, Joe Biden is slightly trailing his Republican opponent. The current President used his State of the Union speech to highlight the country’s strong economic performance. What is however striking is that consumer confidence is now significantly lower than what a so far successful model combining the unemployment rate, inflation and equity prices suggests. It seems the US extreme political polarization is colouring citizens’ assessment of the state of the economy, but Biden cannot count of Democrats’ enthusiasm about their economic conditions. Indeed, even they assess them as slightly below their long-term average. Looking back at all incumbent’s re-election bids since 1972, the level of consumer confidence at this stage of the campaign is lower than those seen in successful bids. Now, elections are not necessarily won on the economy. Donald Trump’s lost his own re-election bid in 2020 despite a high level of consumer confidence. We think it is however time to start looking hard at what a possible second Trump mandate could mean. We focus on a recent contribution of Peter Navarro, Donald Trump’s former international trade envoy. He unveiled in detail his plan for the US to threaten – and potentially ultimately enforce – additional custom levies to systematically bring the US tariffs on par with the tariffs imposed by the US clients. Some of these elements have already found their way into Donald Trump’s campaign. This would hurt geopolitical allies of the US such as the EU, as well as an emerging power such as India, on top of China, the explicit key target there. Separately, we think Christine Lagarde hinted quite clearly as June as the likeliest moment for the first rate cut. The ECB still needs more clarity on wage growth in particular, but the more dovish than expected new batch of forecasts signals a clear readiness not to waste too much time before starting to remove some of the current policy restriction.
Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.
This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.
The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.
Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.